Saturday, August 22, 2015
Thursday, August 20, 2015
When the wolfs guard the herd
I could never stress enough the probable stupidity of allowing the terrorist governments the possibility of developing the most dreadful weapon on the planet, nor the stupidity and blindness of certain leaders who fail to see the dangers of this. Today's Chamberlains are the real threat to the safety of mankind as these people have failed to understand the mistakes of the past and, I'm afraid, have all the chances of being bound to repeat them. And, like in the past, it's us, the simple people, who'll end up paying the unbearable price for their own stupidity and blindness (or corruption).
When an organization which is supposed to prevent the possibility of a nuclear holocaust, fails miserably to do so by being driven by the blindness and the economic interests of some of its leaders, then the leadership of this organization has failed miserably to represent the interests of the world and must be replaced by a competent leadership. A leadership that would understand that no country threatening to destroy other countries should be allowed the possibility of developing weapons of mass destruction, nor should be allowed to have its funds unfrozen so that it could sponsor continue to sponsor terrorism on a worldwide scale, as it has done since 1979. The development of nuclear energy should be allowed only for peaceful means and only to countries which have shown that they are walking the path of democracy and peaceful cooperation with all the nations of the world. It's no brainer that Iran is not walking this path, the country having taken the path Germany took in 1933. And, unfortunately, the world is clearly repeating the same mistakes it made during the 1933-1938 decade, showing it has learned nothing from its own mistakes. Last time Nazi Germany was almost on the brink of the nuclear threshold and only the Normandy invasion, combined with the hijacking of the submarine carrying uranium from South America to Germany saved us from a nuclear holocaust. With a nuclear Iran, we might not have that chance. Giving a weapon of mass destruction to a country in which the government sponsors terrorism and incite on a daily basis to destroy the West is an act of massive stupidity. Our only hope is that the US Congress will realize the dangers this agreement (which has been clearly written by people who haven't written an agreement their entire life) an will refuse to approve a document that might lead to a nuclear holocaust. Anyway, my hope and prayer is that I would either be proven wrong or that Iran will be allowed to develop nuclear energy only after it has taken the path of peace and cooperation with all the nations of the world, the which would require a change of regime, from a dictatorial Islamic republic to a real democracy.
When an organization which is supposed to prevent the possibility of a nuclear holocaust, fails miserably to do so by being driven by the blindness and the economic interests of some of its leaders, then the leadership of this organization has failed miserably to represent the interests of the world and must be replaced by a competent leadership. A leadership that would understand that no country threatening to destroy other countries should be allowed the possibility of developing weapons of mass destruction, nor should be allowed to have its funds unfrozen so that it could sponsor continue to sponsor terrorism on a worldwide scale, as it has done since 1979. The development of nuclear energy should be allowed only for peaceful means and only to countries which have shown that they are walking the path of democracy and peaceful cooperation with all the nations of the world. It's no brainer that Iran is not walking this path, the country having taken the path Germany took in 1933. And, unfortunately, the world is clearly repeating the same mistakes it made during the 1933-1938 decade, showing it has learned nothing from its own mistakes. Last time Nazi Germany was almost on the brink of the nuclear threshold and only the Normandy invasion, combined with the hijacking of the submarine carrying uranium from South America to Germany saved us from a nuclear holocaust. With a nuclear Iran, we might not have that chance. Giving a weapon of mass destruction to a country in which the government sponsors terrorism and incite on a daily basis to destroy the West is an act of massive stupidity. Our only hope is that the US Congress will realize the dangers this agreement (which has been clearly written by people who haven't written an agreement their entire life) an will refuse to approve a document that might lead to a nuclear holocaust. Anyway, my hope and prayer is that I would either be proven wrong or that Iran will be allowed to develop nuclear energy only after it has taken the path of peace and cooperation with all the nations of the world, the which would require a change of regime, from a dictatorial Islamic republic to a real democracy.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
TALKING ABOUT APARTHEID: THE 'ARAB LEAGUE'S WAY
THE RACIST APARTHEID 'ARAB LEAGUE'
Main victims: Africans, Jews
Sudan democratic gazette: a newsletter for democratic pluralism: Issues 44-55 - 1994 - Pages 50, 120Egyptian diplomacy moved in March to mislead the Arab world on Southern Sudan by pressing the Arab League to pass a resolution opposing the right to Self- determination of the people of Southern and the Nuba mountains. This is the first time that the Arab League has adopted a racist stance on what has previously been considered to be an internal Sudanese matter. As such, it marks the internationalisation of the conflict. The resolution was so racist... The resolution incites the Arab world to join Khartoum in its racial and religious war against the South. Egypt now appears prepared to commit its own resources to the war in Sudan... The Arab states are also members of the overtly racist Arab League of Nations which passed a resolution in March condemning any moves towards granting Self- determination for Southern Sudan...
http://books.google.com/books?
Arab League and KKK are Two Faces for One Coin By Elhadi Adam Elomda
By Elhadi Adam Elomda
Date: March 23, 2005
Arab League and KKK are Two Faces for One Coin
The KKK (Ku Klux Klan) is equivalent to the Arab League. This is because of the similarity and agreement of these two terrorist organizations' goals. The KKK was founded to promote the white man's superiority in the United States of America. It looks for the dominance of white men within political, economical, and cultural aspects in the USA. The KKK started to achieve its goals by strengthening the relations among the white men in the USA. However, the KKK used discriminative means against the minority black people in the USA in order to achieve its prospective goals. As a result, the back people and disheartened white people revolted against the KKK. Therefore, the KKK was disbanded in the 1940s although it changed its goals of hating the black people into love of white people. By the time the KKK was disbanded in the USA as a terrorist organization, another KKK was born.
This new KKK was born in a different area and has a dissimilar name from the former KKK. Yet, this new born KKK has similar goals to the former one. The newly formed KKK is named the Arab League. The Arab League was established in order to strengthen the political, economical, and cultural relations between its members. The league membership constituted of any independent Arab countries from any continent. Charter I states that "Any independent Arab state has the right to become a member of the League." Ironically, all these Arab KKK members were considered Islamic countries. Their values and motivations descended from their Islamic curriculums and the holy Quran book.
http://www.sudaneseonline.com/Arab League SG a "racist" says Darfur JEM, demands public apology ... March 15, 2011 (WASHINGTON) – The Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) today directed fierce criticism at the Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa over remarks he made last week in which he downplayed the gravity of the Darfur conflict compared to the evolving crisis in Libya.
The United Nations says that more than 300,000 people were killed and 2.7 million displaced in the eight-year conflict in Sudan's Western region. Khartoum counters these figures saying no more than 10,000 perished.
"Darfur is no Libya. Darfur since years back the restive situation was a result of foreign interferences and exaggerations in evaluating the situation in Darfur. But we succeeded in recent years in putting the Darfur process on the negotiation table and now there are talks under the [auspices of the] United Nations and the African Union and the Arab League [hosted] by Qatar and there is progress, " Moussa said in response to a question posed by a journalist on why the Arab League moved swiftly to ask the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to impose a No-Fly Zone over Libya to protect civilians and not in Darfur.
http://www.sudantribune.com/Somalia:Racism at the Arab League
UK-LONDON-Mareeg.com
Somalia was a member of the Arab League since 1974, the same year Palestinian PLO joined the League. Somalia is devastated by civil war since 1990's and continues to hemorrhage. More than 750,000 Somalis lost their lives and more than 3.3 millions are homeless. The organization's 21 Arab nations with the exception of Djibouti have failed to attempt a single reconciliation effort..
http://www.mareeg.com/fidsan.The blessed human race: essays on reconsideration - Page 39
George Jochnowitz - University Press of America, 2007 - 123 pages (ISBN 0761837337, 9780761837336)
Despite Israel's lack of importance and despite the weakness of the moral charges against it, Israel is an outcast. Israeli nationalism — Zionism — has been declared racism. The Arab League enforces secondary and tertiary boycotts against Israel. Jews may not enter Saudi Arabia, except for American soldiers. Malaysia forbids the performance of "Jewish" music. This endless policy of boycott and non-recognition is officially the policy of most Arab states. Countries like Libya, Iraq or Saudi Arabia have never suggested that they would make peace if Israel did X or Y or Z. Their opposition to Israel, supported by leftists everywhere in the world, is one of permanent enmity. Since such a stance excludes the possibility of peace, it is implicitly genocidal and therefore radically evil.
http://books.google.com/books?
Federation Blog
May 12, 2010 ... The modern DFI movement began in earnest 2002 during the Second Intifada. It began with all intents and purposes at Harvard and MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) with a high profile petition on these campus to divest from Israel. The DFI movement has its roots in the original Arab-League Boycott of Israel. This antecedent movement is unabashedly anti-semitic and racist, having started with a de facto boycott as early as 1922 against Jewish interests, not Israeli interests, 26 years prior to the establishment of the State of Israel. The Arab League Council formally instated a boycott on December 2, 1945: "Jewish products and manufactured goods shall be considered undesirable to the Arab countries". That, might I remind you, is a little less than 3 years before the establishment of the State of Israel and 22 years before the "occupation" began following the 6-Day War in 1967.
The Arab-League Boycott and the modern DFI are not one in the same; however, they share the same ideological roots of racism and anti-Semitism towards anyone from Israel. During the initial years of the Arab-League Boycott, all products, whether made by Jew or Arab were boycotted...
http://www.jfedsrq.org/blog_Racism risk in calls for Israeli boycott | The Australian Sep 19, 2009 ... Calls to boycott Israel are nothing new. The Arab League has boycotted Israel since its creation in 1948. The most recent international campaign for an academic boycott of Israel started in April 2002 following the Israeli invasion of Palestinian West Bank cities in response to the mass suicide bombing attacks on Israeli civilians in the previous month.
... It is incongruous that many of the boycott proponents are of Jewish extraction. None of these figures seems to have considered that a boycott together with their inflammatory rhetoric (and fundamentalist anti-Zionism more generally) might provoke racist discrimination against Jews...
http://www.theaustralian.com.The Palestinian lobby is heralding this as a success for their strategy of Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions, itself an extension of a racist Arab League boycott campaign against Jews that goes back (formally) to 1945 - years before the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel.
http://www.zionismontheweb.THE RACIST APARTHEID 'ARAB LEAGUE'
Main victims: Africans, Jews
Sudan democratic gazette: a newsletter for democratic pluralism: Issues 44-55 - 1994 - Pages 50, 120Egyptian diplomacy moved in March to mislead the Arab world on Southern Sudan by pressing the Arab League to pass a resolution opposing the right to Self- determination of the people of Southern and the Nuba mountains. This is the first time that the Arab League has adopted a racist stance on what has previously been considered to be an internal Sudanese matter. As such, it marks the internationalisation of the conflict. The resolution was so racist... The resolution incites the Arab world to join Khartoum in its racial and religious war against the South. Egypt now appears prepared to commit its own resources to the war in Sudan... The Arab states are also members of the overtly racist Arab League of Nations which passed a resolution in March condemning any moves towards granting Self- determination for Southern Sudan...
http://books.google.com/books?
Arab League and KKK are Two Faces for One Coin By Elhadi Adam Elomda
By Elhadi Adam Elomda
Date: March 23, 2005
Arab League and KKK are Two Faces for One Coin
The KKK (Ku Klux Klan) is equivalent to the Arab League. This is because of the similarity and agreement of these two terrorist organizations' goals. The KKK was founded to promote the white man's superiority in the United States of America. It looks for the dominance of white men within political, economical, and cultural aspects in the USA. The KKK started to achieve its goals by strengthening the relations among the white men in the USA. However, the KKK used discriminative means against the minority black people in the USA in order to achieve its prospective goals. As a result, the back people and disheartened white people revolted against the KKK. Therefore, the KKK was disbanded in the 1940s although it changed its goals of hating the black people into love of white people. By the time the KKK was disbanded in the USA as a terrorist organization, another KKK was born.
This new KKK was born in a different area and has a dissimilar name from the former KKK. Yet, this new born KKK has similar goals to the former one. The newly formed KKK is named the Arab League. The Arab League was established in order to strengthen the political, economical, and cultural relations between its members. The league membership constituted of any independent Arab countries from any continent. Charter I states that "Any independent Arab state has the right to become a member of the League." Ironically, all these Arab KKK members were considered Islamic countries. Their values and motivations descended from their Islamic curriculums and the holy Quran book.
http://www.sudaneseonline.com/Arab League SG a "racist" says Darfur JEM, demands public apology ... March 15, 2011 (WASHINGTON) – The Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) today directed fierce criticism at the Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa over remarks he made last week in which he downplayed the gravity of the Darfur conflict compared to the evolving crisis in Libya.
The United Nations says that more than 300,000 people were killed and 2.7 million displaced in the eight-year conflict in Sudan's Western region. Khartoum counters these figures saying no more than 10,000 perished.
"Darfur is no Libya. Darfur since years back the restive situation was a result of foreign interferences and exaggerations in evaluating the situation in Darfur. But we succeeded in recent years in putting the Darfur process on the negotiation table and now there are talks under the [auspices of the] United Nations and the African Union and the Arab League [hosted] by Qatar and there is progress, " Moussa said in response to a question posed by a journalist on why the Arab League moved swiftly to ask the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to impose a No-Fly Zone over Libya to protect civilians and not in Darfur.
http://www.sudantribune.com/Somalia:Racism at the Arab League
UK-LONDON-Mareeg.com
Somalia was a member of the Arab League since 1974, the same year Palestinian PLO joined the League. Somalia is devastated by civil war since 1990's and continues to hemorrhage. More than 750,000 Somalis lost their lives and more than 3.3 millions are homeless. The organization's 21 Arab nations with the exception of Djibouti have failed to attempt a single reconciliation effort..
http://www.mareeg.com/fidsan.The blessed human race: essays on reconsideration - Page 39
George Jochnowitz - University Press of America, 2007 - 123 pages (ISBN 0761837337, 9780761837336)
Despite Israel's lack of importance and despite the weakness of the moral charges against it, Israel is an outcast. Israeli nationalism — Zionism — has been declared racism. The Arab League enforces secondary and tertiary boycotts against Israel. Jews may not enter Saudi Arabia, except for American soldiers. Malaysia forbids the performance of "Jewish" music. This endless policy of boycott and non-recognition is officially the policy of most Arab states. Countries like Libya, Iraq or Saudi Arabia have never suggested that they would make peace if Israel did X or Y or Z. Their opposition to Israel, supported by leftists everywhere in the world, is one of permanent enmity. Since such a stance excludes the possibility of peace, it is implicitly genocidal and therefore radically evil.
http://books.google.com/books?
Federation Blog
May 12, 2010 ... The modern DFI movement began in earnest 2002 during the Second Intifada. It began with all intents and purposes at Harvard and MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) with a high profile petition on these campus to divest from Israel. The DFI movement has its roots in the original Arab-League Boycott of Israel. This antecedent movement is unabashedly anti-semitic and racist, having started with a de facto boycott as early as 1922 against Jewish interests, not Israeli interests, 26 years prior to the establishment of the State of Israel. The Arab League Council formally instated a boycott on December 2, 1945: "Jewish products and manufactured goods shall be considered undesirable to the Arab countries". That, might I remind you, is a little less than 3 years before the establishment of the State of Israel and 22 years before the "occupation" began following the 6-Day War in 1967.
The Arab-League Boycott and the modern DFI are not one in the same; however, they share the same ideological roots of racism and anti-Semitism towards anyone from Israel. During the initial years of the Arab-League Boycott, all products, whether made by Jew or Arab were boycotted...
http://www.jfedsrq.org/blog_Racism risk in calls for Israeli boycott | The Australian Sep 19, 2009 ... Calls to boycott Israel are nothing new. The Arab League has boycotted Israel since its creation in 1948. The most recent international campaign for an academic boycott of Israel started in April 2002 following the Israeli invasion of Palestinian West Bank cities in response to the mass suicide bombing attacks on Israeli civilians in the previous month.
... It is incongruous that many of the boycott proponents are of Jewish extraction. None of these figures seems to have considered that a boycott together with their inflammatory rhetoric (and fundamentalist anti-Zionism more generally) might provoke racist discrimination against Jews...
http://www.theaustralian.com.The Palestinian lobby is heralding this as a success for their strategy of Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions, itself an extension of a racist Arab League boycott campaign against Jews that goes back (formally) to 1945 - years before the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel.
http://www.zionismontheweb.Adolf's at it again.
Adolf is at it's usual again. The little dictator who muss-murdered last year hundreds of people requesting freedom has once again turned to its worthless and cowardly antisemitic speaking just to cover his crimes and to hope that they will be forgiven. Unfortunately, the world is full of people wo would rather turn a blnd eye to these crimes and be Isam's useful idiots, just in order to release, once again, their racism and antisemitism on all over the world.
David
David
http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=225084 Photo by: REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl ASTANA - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched into a brutal attack of the West at a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization on Wednesday, mentioning Zionism as one of history’s worst ills. He said that 60 plus years of Zionism has brought only humiliation and destruction to the Palestinians and the region. But Israel got off easy in Ahmadinejad’s tirade, viciously attacking the US and the West for a long litany that includes slavery, colonizations, the pillaging of Africa, World War Iand II and numerous wars since then, dropping a nuclear bomb on defenseless civilians, and creating the atmosphere leading to 9/11 which he said was the pretext for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq which he said has cost some one million casualties The other leaders at the conference, including Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, and the leaders of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan,Tajikistan, India, Pakistan and Mongolia, sat impassively during his comments. Each leader at the conference, marking the 10 years since the founding of the regional security organization that presents itself as counterbalance to NATO, spoke briefly and – with Ahmadinejad’s short exception – steered wide of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict or the current upheaval in the Middle east. The leaders also made no mention of Iran’s nuclear threat. China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are full members of the organization, which promotes economic, military and security cooperation. Iran, Pakistan, India, and Mongolia enjoy observer status. Because of UN sanctions against it, Iran is presently barred from joining as a full member. |
Back!
Well, finally I am back after a very long time having been far away an unable to write down. But now that I am back, I hope to be able to continue the ideas behind this blog and to be able to continue my project. Thanks all for the support.
David
David
Monday, April 12, 2010
Is the Cathlic church returning to its old ways?
| Report: Church abuse claims are 'Zionist attack', bishop says | |||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||
| By Haaretz Service | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1162432.html | |||||||||||||||
| A retired Italian bishop has sparked a furious row after quotes attributed to him suggested claims of sexual abuse in the Catholic church are a Jewish conspiracy, a British newspaper reported on Monday. A website quoted Giacomo Babini, emeritus bishop of Grosseto, as saying he believed a "Zionist attack" was behind the criticism, considering how "powerful and refined" the criticism is, the Guardian daily reported. Babini has denied the comments, which follow a series of statements from Catholic churchmen alleging the existence of plots to weaken the church and Pope Benedict XVI. | |||||||||||||||
| Allegedly speaking to the Catholic website Pontifex, the 81-year-old was quoted as saying: "They do not want the church, they are its natural enemies. Deep down, historically speaking, the Jews are God killers." Italy's Bishops' Conference rushed out a statement quoting Babini denying he had given the interview in the first place. "Statements I have never made about our Jewish brothers have been attributed to me," he said. Babini has previously been quoted on the Pontifex website accusing Jews of exploiting the Holocaust, as well as criticising homosexuality. The American Jewish Committee, which spotted the interview on Friday, said Babini was using "slanderous stereotypes, which sadly evoke the worst Christian and Nazi propaganda prior to world war two". Pope Benedict has come under increasing pressure over his handling of a series of cases involving proven molesters before he became pope in 2005 - most recently in California, where his signature appears on an 1985 letter opposing calls to defrock a pedophile priest. | |||||||||||||||
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Far Right Could Gain in Hungary Elections
Personally, taking look at the world's tendencies throughout the last 15
years , I can't say I am surprised because I am not. What I am surpred of,
and what terrifies me, is the fact that, though Hungary has been manoeuvring
countries one against the other in the their attempt to destabilize the
region and to get back their territories lost (rightfully) during the last
world war, and no one says nothing against this.
David
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world/europe/12hungary.html?pagewanted=1&ref=global-home
Far Right Could Gain in Hungary Elections By DAN BILEFSKY
BUDAPEST — A far-right party whose black-clad paramilitary extremists invoke
1940s Europe was poised to gain new clout in elections here Sunday, a result
that could tarnish Hungary's international image and potentially undermine
its economic recovery.
Analysts said that one of the biggest beneficiaries of the collective angst
of a country hit hard by the global financial crisis could prove to be the
party, Jobbik, which has railed against "Gypsy crime" and Jews, and is
widely expected to enter Parliament for the first time.
Recent polls showed the prospect of Jobbik getting the most votes after
Fidesz, the center-right party of Viktor Orban, a former prime minister, who
is expected to regain that role.
The incumbent Socialist government led by Gordon Bajnai since April 2009 has
been blamed for the country's economic turmoil and is expected to suffer
heavy losses.
Jobbik's leader, Gabor Vona, 32, a former history teacher who has tapped
into a growing nationalism fanned by economic hardship, is a founding member
of the Magyar Garda, an association whose uniforms are reminiscent of those
worn by the Arrow Cross, Hungary's wartime Nazi party. The group, which was
outlawed last year but has not disbanded, has revived dark memories of World
War II, when Jews and Roma were deported to concentration camps.
Analysts said Jobbik's growing popularity illustrates how the economic
crisis was helping to fuel a regional backlash against
Saturday, April 10, 2010
President of Poland Killed in Plane Crash in Russia
President of Poland Killed in Plane Crash in Russia
Sergei Karpukhin/Reuters
An interior ministry officer stood guard near a part of the wreckage.
By ELLEN BARRY, MICHAL PIOTROWSKI and NICHOLAS KULISH
Published: April 10, 2010
Television showed chunks of flaming fuselage scattered in a bare forest near Smolensk, where the president was arriving for a ceremony commemorating the murder of more than 20,000 Polish officers by the Soviet secret police after the Red Army invaded Poland.
You an read the full article here
Friday, April 9, 2010
The Biggest Con-Game in the Middle East
The Middle East's Biggest Con-Game: Claiming Israel is the Cause of
the Region's Problems
By Barry Rubin
April 7, 2010
http://www.gloria-center.org/
A former senior Canadian diplomat, Robert Fowler, made the main
foreign policy speech to the Liberal Party convention there. He
voiced the most common myth about the contemporary Middle East. In
fact, it is a myth now returning to favor in the United States after
many years in the shadows. (The last thing that killed it was the
1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait which indicated there were a few other
problems in the region.)
Regarding Fowler, let me quote from the Ottawa Citizen editorial
about the speech:
"Fowler singled out Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, as
the primary source of instability in the region. Meanwhile, a country
like Iran -- a totalitarian theocracy bent on obtaining nuclear
weapons, which it has already threatened to use -- didn't get a
mention. Is that Fowler's idea of an "even-handed" approach to the
Middle East?
"By externalizing blame for Arab-Muslim dysfunction--pinning it on
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on Israeli intransigence in
particular-- Fowler is playing into the hands of all the Muslim
dictators, autocrats and mullahs who use the "Zionist" threat to win
popular legitimacy and to justify their refusal to embrace
modernization, democratization and economic reform.
Read the full article
the Region's Problems
By Barry Rubin
April 7, 2010
http://www.gloria-center.org/
A former senior Canadian diplomat, Robert Fowler, made the main
foreign policy speech to the Liberal Party convention there. He
voiced the most common myth about the contemporary Middle East. In
fact, it is a myth now returning to favor in the United States after
many years in the shadows. (The last thing that killed it was the
1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait which indicated there were a few other
problems in the region.)
Regarding Fowler, let me quote from the Ottawa Citizen editorial
about the speech:
"Fowler singled out Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, as
the primary source of instability in the region. Meanwhile, a country
like Iran -- a totalitarian theocracy bent on obtaining nuclear
weapons, which it has already threatened to use -- didn't get a
mention. Is that Fowler's idea of an "even-handed" approach to the
Middle East?
"By externalizing blame for Arab-Muslim dysfunction--pinning it on
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and on Israeli intransigence in
particular-- Fowler is playing into the hands of all the Muslim
dictators, autocrats and mullahs who use the "Zionist" threat to win
popular legitimacy and to justify their refusal to embrace
modernization, democratization and economic reform.
Read the full article
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)